Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:16:03 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        smp@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Anomalous performance increase from mutex profiling
Message-ID:  <86mzekbosc.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20060417051440.GB60956@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:14:40 -0400")
References:  <20060417051440.GB60956@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> However, even with CVS sources I found something very odd: when
> MUTEX_PROFILING is compiled in but not enabled (which usually still
> makes things slower), I see a clear 38% +/- 3% performance *increase*
> on this benchmark.

Heisenberg strikes!
Heisenberg strikes!
Heisenberg strikes!
You are uncertain.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mzekbosc.fsf>