Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:48 +0000 (UTC) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: ppc(4) vs. ppbus(4) module? Message-ID: <ac5pq4$1njp$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So far, I've had device ppc device ppbus device lpt in my KERNEL file to provide parallel printer support. Now I've noticed that ppbus and lpt are also available as modules. However, when I try to build a kernel with just device ppc (intending to load ppbus.ko and lpt.ko later), the build aborts because sys/isa/ppc.c tries to include ppbus_if.h, which isn't available without "device ppbus". Okay, so I'll just include "device ppbus" again, I guess. But then, what's the point of having a ppbus.ko at all? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ac5pq4$1njp$1>