Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 21:52:20 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: "Kriston J. Rehberg" <kriston@ibm.net> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD A Solution For Business Message-ID: <356A3C74.7A303AED@softweyr.com> References: <01bd85e0$2dccb1c0$f820aace@eliot.pacbell.net> <199805230337.UAA02883@osprey.grizzly.com> <3626-Sat23May1998005302-0400-kriston@ibm.net> <199805230527.WAA03120@osprey.grizzly.com> <7442-Sat23May1998233810-0400-kriston@ibm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kriston J. Rehberg wrote:
> Yeah, but I thought the problem is that you don't have a guarantee
> that the scheduler will run your Apache process on the second Pentium.
> I don't tend to believe that merely adding processors automatically
> makes everything faster.
Sure it will, even if only because all the *other* processes are running
on the other processor. It's not exactly symmetric, but it still helps
for at least two processors.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?356A3C74.7A303AED>