Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:15:19 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile ports/sysutils/portupgrade/files patch-portinfo.rb Message-ID: <1087863318.25969.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200406220048.06263.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200406211738.i5LHcnYk075412@repoman.freebsd.org> <200406220048.06263.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 18:47, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Monday 21 June 2004 19:38, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > knu 2004-06-21 17:38:49 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > sysutils/portupgrade Makefile > > Added files: > > sysutils/portupgrade/files patch-portinfo.rb > > Log: > > Support the new, extended INDEX format. > > This completely breaks portupgrade for me... is the new INDEX format stuff > committed yet at all? See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/68178 for a fix. knu's patch was suppose to make portupgrade work for both INDEX schemes, but there was a problem with one of the lines. Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA13oWb2iPiv4Uz4cRAl72AJoDinJgpfBLP8UoO3fd4tKd44QUkwCgoXeR o+jEscZNOqFpBPtLBst3Mhg= =xHsJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1087863318.25969.3.camel>