Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:35:13 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default Message-ID: <20111202063513.GB88903@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=AkwU7N-W9hbQNik_hGoR8rwoTrjMJGv0itd5u4uN39Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADe0-4=DwzFj1NbJTeq3p92YGF_5yjhc-Yajn-hHNB_aca1k2g@mail.gmail.com> <20111202015133.GA4111@dragon.NUXI.org> <CAJ-Vmo=AkwU7N-W9hbQNik_hGoR8rwoTrjMJGv0itd5u4uN39Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to > > invert a 17 year default. > > > > I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in -CURRENT. > > > > If you like, add it to the list of things to disable on -STABLE creation. > > It's easier to do that than go review/re-engineer bloated code. :) > To what does "that" refer? -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111202063513.GB88903>