Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:50:47 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r190943 - head/include Message-ID: <20090412125047.fb6adf5a.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090412030054.GA54299@zim.MIT.EDU> References: <200904111657.n3BGvpsC092703@svn.freebsd.org> <20090411210702.ce5325b9.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20090412021841.673a200b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20090412030054.GA54299@zim.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:00:54 -0400 > > > Can't we just put a patch in ports tree itself? What meant under 'no > > > clean solution emerged'? I can prepare a patch, if needed. > > I think so, too. I have a quick hack patch. > As I mentioned to vd@ on 3/20, I'd prefer something like > that. Does your proposed patch also work for the ports that depend > on GNU Pth, some of which may depend on signal.h? Yes, no problem! Pth required singal.h's definision(SIGINT, SIGQUIT, ...), and it was already token care in pthread.h.in like following: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /* * Protect namespace, because possibly existing vendor Pthread stuff * would certainly conflict with our defintions of pthread*_t. */ #define pthread_t __vendor_pthread_t : #include <sys/signal.h> /* for sigset_t */ : /* * Unprotect namespace, so we can define our own variants now */ #undef pthread_t : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090412125047.fb6adf5a.nork>