Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:44:25 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Final upgrades of tools in 2.2-STABLE Message-ID: <19981231104425.B9094@ucb.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <14812.915093240@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Thu, Dec 31, 1998 at 12:34:00AM -0800 References: <199812310654.OAA89915@spinner.netplex.com.au> <14812.915093240@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 31, 1998 at 12:34:00AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > On the other, it messes up people tracking 2.2-stable just for minor bug > > fixes and probably wouldn't appreciate arriving at work in the morning and > > discovering they've now got to reconfigure sendmail and bind and that ipfw > > now gives parameter size errors. > > For this reason, I'd prefer to avoid bind or anything else which > requires intervention. Upgrading sendmail would be fine. :) > > - Jordan Happy NY! How about voting on a freebsd-stable? Personally I for upgrading both BIND and Sendmail. Most of people will run 2.2-STABLE for a long time until 3.0 will become stable. BR, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981231104425.B9094>