Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:03:36 -0800 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, Charlie Root <blaz@satx.rr.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sendmail junk, other questions Message-ID: <20001114160336.A89784@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <200011142322.eAENMZJ16137@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 03:22:35PM -0800 References: <20001112013044.M75251@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <200011142322.eAENMZJ16137@ptavv.es.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 03:22:35PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I recently ran into this problem, too. The source is that /etc/rc DOES
> run sendmail regardless of the value of sendmail_enable if there is a
> recoverable vi session on the system.
>
> I really wish that this was not the case. Unless you edit /etc/rc,
> it's unavoidable and I don't think this is right. But I can live with
> it.
[snip]
> sendmail -t < "${i}"
[snip]
This does not run sendmail as a daemon which is what the
sendmail_enable switch controls. I don't see any problem here. What am
I missing?
--
Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001114160336.A89784>