Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:58:10 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: ml-freebsd-stable Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HPN-SSH question Message-ID: <1196DEC9-2AEE-4F9A-8521-EFA8513D6003@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <40A76FC1992140AFA5B8EB52C28DB3A1@multiplay.co.uk> References: <9728B37F7A4EBE45A2FD4B18883BAED6D02612@SN2PRD0802MB111.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <BE96C8EC5CEB4411BAA45D9A5882CDAB@multiplay.co.uk> <A6AFCC97-74FE-4B9E-8B9E-B245909D944E@lists.zabbadoz.net> <40A76FC1992140AFA5B8EB52C28DB3A1@multiplay.co.uk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote: > Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably > reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite > as one would expect. I don't have the exact figures I'm afraid as > we just went straight back to standard ssh. > > I'll try and get some time to retest and provide some proper > results. Thanks. If you do please try the bundled version in 8-STABLE or 9 and also gather the usual meta data (latency, packet loss, IPv4/v6, any socket buffer tuning, ...). /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1196DEC9-2AEE-4F9A-8521-EFA8513D6003>