Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:56:28 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/glxsb glxsb.c glxsb_hash.c Message-ID: <20080812085627.GQ64458@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200808111306.00982.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200808110841.m7B8fH4m067740@repoman.freebsd.org> <200808111306.00982.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fDERRRNgB4on1jOB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Aug-11 13:06:00 -0400, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: >Would it be worthwhile to abstract the session handling out of padlock(4) = and=20 >glxsb(4)? Are there other CPUs with embedded crypto that will need their = own=20 >drivers that having the abstraction would make writing a driver easier? sun4v has hardware crypto. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --fDERRRNgB4on1jOB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkihUDsACgkQ/opHv/APuIdFAQCeMZoIrzVI8qYXcsJyqy4xiIBw TU0AoJ7qspsuajq9m6SW2C1XN0JH5h5C =fusM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fDERRRNgB4on1jOB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080812085627.GQ64458>