Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:30:03 +0100
From:      Rink Springer <rink@il.fontys.nl>
To:        Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: opinion on which software RAID to use
Message-ID:  <20060302193003.GB95124@il.fontys.nl>
In-Reply-To: <AD79084E-2D70-47E3-ABF7-ED633BB8B446@khera.org>
References:  <AD79084E-2D70-47E3-ABF7-ED633BB8B446@khera.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hi Vivek,

> Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage  
> (ie, recover after failure) and performance?  The handbook RAID page  
> doesn't even mention gmirror.  The atacontrol seems very simple to  
> use, at least.

I've had very good results with gmirror. It's very easy to set up,
performance is good (didn't really benchmark it though) and recovering
faulty drives is easy to do. Never had a problem with it ...

-- 
Rink P.W. Springer                                - http://rink.nu
  "Richter: Tribute? You steal men's souls, and make them your slaves!
   Dracula: Perhaps the same could be said of all religions."
 - Castlevania: Symphony of the Night

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEB0e7b3O60uztv/8RAiOLAJoDkXlomJHYWgApmNyhaUFoma5avgCgkKeO
tyNi/xHb8c9VsQ+9V6KrKPA=
=VpZc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060302193003.GB95124>