Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:30:03 +0100 From: Rink Springer <rink@il.fontys.nl> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opinion on which software RAID to use Message-ID: <20060302193003.GB95124@il.fontys.nl> In-Reply-To: <AD79084E-2D70-47E3-ABF7-ED633BB8B446@khera.org> References: <AD79084E-2D70-47E3-ABF7-ED633BB8B446@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vivek, > Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage =20 > (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page =20 > doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to =20 > use, at least. I've had very good results with gmirror. It's very easy to set up, performance is good (didn't really benchmark it though) and recovering faulty drives is easy to do. Never had a problem with it ... --=20 Rink P.W. Springer - http://rink.nu "Richter: Tribute? You steal men's souls, and make them your slaves! Dracula: Perhaps the same could be said of all religions." - Castlevania: Symphony of the Night --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEB0e7b3O60uztv/8RAiOLAJoDkXlomJHYWgApmNyhaUFoma5avgCgkKeO tyNi/xHb8c9VsQ+9V6KrKPA= =VpZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060302193003.GB95124>