Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:30:13 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r243850 - stable/9/sys/kern Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=utFQ9Tp8a4E0zU0ydn1EBHVhVWxQM98%2BaexsQ7GOW9g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121204014655.GN3013@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201212040054.qB40snD5001979@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgmTEYmgRmn7UO%2Bv293mH8RZ63Ago6cZ8ENoc-C=g9T5uw@mail.gmail.com> <20121204014655.GN3013@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 December 2012 20:46, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > Less formal, I do not see much use in the single commit spanning both > sys and non-sys. We almost never should have such interlock, otherwise > ABI issues would cause troubles for people updating the system. > And spanning commits are somewhat more cumbersome to both merge, > revert and for non-developer to pick. This isn't an issue of sys and non-sys being tied together. This is one of documentation and feature being committed together. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=utFQ9Tp8a4E0zU0ydn1EBHVhVWxQM98%2BaexsQ7GOW9g>