Date: 12 May 1998 19:39:34 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <xzpiunb75ih.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Tue, 12 May 1998 07:46:20 -0700" References: <348.894984380@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> writes: > > Hmm... both? shouldn't really be too difficult as long as you don't > > try to compile a kernel with both of them together. > Well, is there any possibility that someone from INRIA could "get > together" with someone from the WIDE project [...] In the meantime, (and concerning my more immediate problem of running IPv6 on something newer than 2.2.5) Francis Dupont has told me that he has finished porting his stack to FreeBSD 2.2.6, so at least I won't have to run 2.2.5. But I still would like to run STABLE, and any attempt to cvsup will clobber the IPv6 code... I have also taken a look at the WIDE stack, and at first glance it seems to be much better packaged than the INRIA stack, but I am not in a position to compare the quality of the two implementations. -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpiunb75ih.fsf>