Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:10:35 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Cc: Michael Pounov <misho@aitbg.com>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /usr/bin/as: out of memory allocating 4194304 bytes after a total of 524288000 bytes Message-ID: <4F91C2BB.1000808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <A7FB12C8-20FE-405A-88D7-4B872E9544F5@freebsd.org> References: <20120420125718.GD1582@albert.catwhisker.org> <20120420165558.b51c8b66.misho@aitbg.com> <4F91BDE1.4080802@FreeBSD.org> <A7FB12C8-20FE-405A-88D7-4B872E9544F5@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-04-20 21:54, Jason Evans wrote: > On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... >> I think the best solution would be for jemalloc to avoid using obvious >> names like "chunksize" for its globals, because it is basically a >> library that could be linked to any sort of program out there. >> >> For example, it could prefix all its internal-use only globals with >> "jemalloc_" or some other mangling scheme. Jason, any thoughts? > > jemalloc has optional namespace mangling support built in for just this reason. I'll turn it on, hopefully today. Indeed, I had just found jemalloc/internal/private_namespace.h. :) It does seem to list only functions, not variables, is that right?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F91C2BB.1000808>