Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 03:18:06 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: "Scott A. Moberly" <smoberly@karamazov.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spammers Message-ID: <m37k8za9bl.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20030509203926.GA17604@mail.karamazov.org> (Scott A. Moberly's message of "Fri, 9 May 2003 15:39:26 -0500") References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> <m3znlvc2x9.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20030509201306.GA22910@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509203926.GA17604@mail.karamazov.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Scott A. Moberly" <smoberly@karamazov.org> writes: > suggestion for display of ports web-side > > s/@/ at /g > > or someother obscure mix??? More obscure please, not something everybody is doing; it won't be long before spammers' web spiders know the reverse trick. If the obfuscation is more diverse yet still human readable, chances are that it's too much work for the spammer and he'll focus on the easy ones. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m37k8za9bl.fsf>