Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:04:45 -0400 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r354049 - in stable/12/sys/amd64: amd64 include Message-ID: <aa6f8068-bc7f-ee51-f4ef-da0769ae23e1@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4c3b715f-28c3-44d1-f472-63edafab46d0@FreeBSD.org> References: <201910242110.x9OLA91Q073256@repo.freebsd.org> <4c3b715f-28c3-44d1-f472-63edafab46d0@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25.10.2019 13:26, John Baldwin wrote: > On 10/24/19 2:10 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Author: mav >> Date: Thu Oct 24 21:10:09 2019 >> New Revision: 354049 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354049 >> >> Log: >> MFC r351457 (by kib): amd64: rework PCPU allocation >> >> Move pcpu KVA out of .bss into dynamically allocated VA at >> pmap_bootstrap(). This avoids demoting superpage mapping .data/.bss. >> Also it makes possible to use pmap_qenter() for installation of >> domain-local pcpu page on NUMA configs. >> >> Refactor pcpu and IST initialization by moving it to helper functions. > > I'll merge the bhyve change today, but this probably broke bhyve. There > was a followup fix from kib with some other fixes for this beyond bhyve, > or was that just fixes to the actual NUMA allocation of pcpu? Oops, I've missed the bhyve fix. Merged it now. Thanks for notice. As far as I see, the bhyve issue was one of its kind. There were few pcpu allocation fixes, which I merged, and one header reorganization patch, which I think is cosmetic, so I haven't merged it so far, but will take another look. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aa6f8068-bc7f-ee51-f4ef-da0769ae23e1>