Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 1999 15:52:30 -0500
From:      Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>
To:        freebsd hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   VM changes 3.0 to 3.1 RELEASES ?
Message-ID:  <36EC218E.AD43242B@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I posted this to questions, but got no replies.

I am having problems since upgrading from 3.0-SNAP-
981225 to 3.0 and 3.1 RELEASES.

The machine is very modest, a 5X86, 40 mb of RAM and
1.5 gb of disk, 75 mb of swap. It is a firewall for
a small LAN and also runs apache and RealAudio servers
as well as an amateur radio ax.25 networking userland
process. It also runs X on the console with Netscape 4.5
used a lot and uses ghostscript/apsfilter for printing,
both of which are resource hogs.

The worst symptom is natd either core-dumping or
getting into a state where it is using about 95% of
the CPU and network throughput is almost zero.

I began to recompile natd and the alias library with
symbolsto run a core dump trace with gdb, when I realized
that sendmail and inetd were also having problems (core
dumps, eating CPU cycles).

During these episodes, I noticed that swap space
was down to a few mb.

When 3.1 came out, I upgraded and things are much
better,  but ghostscript/apsfilter has gone into
the CPU-cycle-eating mode twice on a big print job.
natd , sendmail and inetd have had no problems on 3.1 .

I have spoken to several people who had the problem
with natd. The stack trace showed that it was trying
to execute the address of the packet buffer as a
function from the alias stuff. It was hopelessly confused, apparently. I
didn't get to do any tracing on sendmail or
inetd. I also saw the "pointer too low to make sense"
error message.

I have searched through RELNOTES, etc and can't find
any mention of any VM changes from 3.0 to 3.1.

Can anyone shed any light on this? Is this something
that is being worked on? Should I upgrade to -STABLE?

What was suspicious to me was that the old 3.0-SNAP
never showed these problems and , I believe, shut
down processes gracefully when system resources became
scarce.
-- 

Thanks,
Jim Durham


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36EC218E.AD43242B>