Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 00:34:30 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Steven G. Kargl" <kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <20020512053430.GA52586@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <20020511133505.C13914@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200205111912.g4BJCG8W072725@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20020511130835.B55218@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020511133505.C13914@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:35:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
> > > -. if ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
> > > -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will
> > > +. if ${CPUTYPE} == "athlon"
> > > +_CPUCFLAGS = -march=athlon
> >
> > AFAIK the k7 is a valid name for the athlon (marchitecture name).
> > Don't break backwards compatibility here.
>
> Nope. Athlon(tm) is the correct name, just like there really isn't a
> "i586". I just posted a patch for review. Being the originator of
> bsd.cpu.mk, I hope you review it.
So if I have an athlon-xp do I set CPUTYPE to athlon and it handles
everything for me and selects the correct one or athlon-xp?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net>
dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020512053430.GA52586>