Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 01:57:26 +0200 From: Andreas Braukmann <braukmann@tse-online.de> To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lucent Wavelan vs. wi-driver Message-ID: <20000926015726.B51222@cage.tse-online.de> In-Reply-To: <20000926012304.B51104@cage.tse-online.de>; from braukmann@tse-online.de on Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 01:23:04AM %2B0200 References: <20000924004338.B37311@cage.tse-online.de> <200009240243.TAA16209@mina.soco.agilent.com> <20000926012304.B51104@cage.tse-online.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Darryl, Warner and still interested readers, ...
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 01:23:04AM +0200, Andreas Braukmann wrote:
> > > The pccardd recognizes the wavelan card and binds it (as expected)
> > > to the the wi driver.
> > [ ... ]
> > > Bringing up the interface with ifconfig results in
> > > "wi0: tx buffer allocation failed" messages.
... the problem is *solved*.
Warner,. ... I stand corrected. It seems, that it was
an interrupt problem in fact.
I'm avoiding the word 'conflict' intentionelly. Why?
My 3COM 374TX 100baseT runs fine on IRQ 5.
My Farralon 10baseT card runs fine on IRQ 5.
Both are doing fine on IRQ 5 under Windows, too.
No other device probes on IRQ 5.
Despite of this, many many thanks for the crucial hint
on the interrupts.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
: Anti-Spam Petition: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ :
: PGP-Key: http://www.tse-online.de/~ab/public-key :
: Key fingerprint: 12 13 EF BC 22 DD F4 B6 3C 25 C9 06 DC D3 45 9B :
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000926015726.B51222>