Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:16:54 +0000 From: Alec Berryman <alec@thened.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opinion on which software RAID to use Message-ID: <20060302201654.GB1054@thened.net> In-Reply-To: <20060302193003.GB95124@il.fontys.nl> References: <AD79084E-2D70-47E3-ABF7-ED633BB8B446@khera.org> <20060302193003.GB95124@il.fontys.nl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Rink Springer on 2006-03-02 20:30:03 +0100: > Hi Vivek, > > > Any opinions on which has both qualities: easy to configure/manage > > (ie, recover after failure) and performance? The handbook RAID page > > doesn't even mention gmirror. The atacontrol seems very simple to > > use, at least. > > I've had very good results with gmirror. It's very easy to set up, > performance is good (didn't really benchmark it though) and recovering > faulty drives is easy to do. Never had a problem with it ... I'll second gmirror. An excellent tutorial may be found at http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEB1K2Aud/2YgchcQRArM2AJ0apwYxKJVBp5vL3EP7vSsHwNMlwwCfechl HBflafoyAgezNdo3KPvquuk= =PMDT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060302201654.GB1054>