Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:18:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@his.com> To: Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@bonkers.video-collage.com>, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/71254: ncurses: xterm vs. cons* termtypes or sc(4) Message-ID: <20070430061658.D84056@mail101.his.com> In-Reply-To: <20070430033526.GA66973@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <200704290809.l3T89I55001072@freefall.freebsd.org> <200704300020.l3U0KXKT044401@bonkers.video-collage.com> <20070430033526.GA66973@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Rong-En Fan wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:20:33PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >>> Synopsis: ncurses: xterm vs. cons* termtypes or sc(4) ... >> Triple-click on a long (one wrapping to the next line) line. Notice, >> that only part of the line gets highlighted by xterm. Opening the same >> file with less/more has the same effect. Cat-ing, however, does not -- >> presumably, because cat does not use [n]curses. > > I think this was explained to you by ncurses author in a private > conversion? From his explanation, if I understand correctly, it's > the correct (or expected) behavior. yes - I recall the conversation (I was pointing out that it is the expected behavior). > > To be clear, I put ncurses author into CC'ed. The conversion I > mentioned is > > Subject: Re: copy/paste long line in ncurses based program > Message-ID: <20070310112419.G3280@mail101.his.com> > > Regards, > Rong-En Fan > -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070430061658.D84056>