Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 11:04:41 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Karlsson <mk-freebsd@bredband.net> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: RE: whitespace question Message-ID: <XFMail.20030401110441.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030401114923.GA606@c-933a70d5.bredbandsbolaget.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01-Apr-2003 Martin Karlsson wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding whitespace, which of the following two alternatives (from a > diff) is correct? The reason I ask is that emacs seems to add some extra > indentation when faced with a linebreak in the middle of a tag. > > > <procedure> > <step> > <para>Get a POP or IMAP daemon from the <ulink > - url="../../../../ports/mail.html">ports collection</ulink> and install > + url="../../../../ports/mail.html">ports > collection</ulink> and install > it on your system.</para> > </step> > > This is with (indent-tabs-mode nil), (sgml-indent-step 2), and > (sgml-indent-data t) set in my .emacs. (But that shouldn't matter, since > the docs set local variables, right?) > > How do I make emacs do the right thing? I just use backspace to line it back up. :) I usually would keep the - indent. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030401110441.jhb>