Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:29:02 -0700 From: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 Message-ID: <20060127012902.61e974dd.kgunders@teamcool.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
An older article I just happened across: <http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/194/45/>; Personally think he's far off the mark, e.g. "The AMD64 edition didn't work well on two systems. Since it has a long and inglorious history of severe stability problems that appear to have carried over into 6.0, I would strongly recommend using the i386 edition of FreeBSD instead of the AMD64 edition." Definitely not congruous with my experiences but then my amd64 systems are far from stressed:-) But thought I'd post the link in case someone wanted to address in more detail. -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060127012902.61e974dd.kgunders>