Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:09:52 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS the perfect FS? if only... Message-ID: <f2057n$uhn$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <cbi6431a042bfp601o08c5pp7abbqmpm54@4ax.com> References: <cbi6431a042bfp601o08c5pp7abbqmpm54@4ax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig17A1312BAA997BF5953AAC68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Elliot Finley wrote: > If you could start with a 3 drive zraid2 as the underlying pool > storage and later add drives to the existing zraid2 as space was > needed, then ZFS would be the ultimate FS (at least for me). >=20 > Any takers? How hard would this be? Isn't zraid2 like RAID6, e.g. includes 2 "parity" components? How do you propose to redistribute the parity blocks after a disk is included in already functioning RAID5 or RAID6 volume? (hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID5#RAID_5) --------------enig17A1312BAA997BF5953AAC68 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGQ5g2ldnAQVacBcgRAop+AJ9rclVAiK3iHbRdG8kUS7sHVXu3nACfTPwE EOvrPHuhXLB5AvVRmt5qo8A= =0Wrg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig17A1312BAA997BF5953AAC68--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f2057n$uhn$1>