Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:02:30 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks Message-ID: <4E6DF4D6.8050501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4E6DB696.1080608@FreeBSD.org> <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 12/09/2011 14:43 John Baldwin said the following: > I suspect some of the recent changes to shave space down for Clang have made > some of the optimization options no longer necessary. Just a note of all the options in question were added long before clang. > I think the patch is > fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like removing > nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well. I personally agree, thank you for this suggestion. My current plan is to leave boot2 alone until stable/9 is branched, but to try to get zfs/gpt boot changes into 9.0. What do you think? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6DF4D6.8050501>