Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:30:28 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-8@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r209503 - stable/8/sys/kern Message-ID: <AANLkTimtXJB7vdCIbRg9bjQ2yGRG6zdkWoW_AxrtYNOB@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006241208.o5OC8om3082418@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201006241208.o5OC8om3082418@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/6/24 John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > Author: jhb > Date: Thu Jun 24 12:08:50 2010 > New Revision: 209503 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209503 > > Log: > =C2=A0MFC 208391: > =C2=A0Assert that the thread passed to sched_bind() and sched_unbind() is > =C2=A0curthread as those routines are only supported for curthread curren= tly. In general, I think that possibly sched_bind() and sched_unbind() may loose their argument in the future. Of course, that is a KPI breakage (which may be unconfortable to work with)= . Attilio --=20 Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimtXJB7vdCIbRg9bjQ2yGRG6zdkWoW_AxrtYNOB>