Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 04:17:17 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa/snd ad1848.c sb_dsp.c sound.c Message-ID: <21391.897304637@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jun 1998 11:53:18 %2B0200." <199806080953.LAA03173@sos.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > LINT compiles fine, but some modules are so bogusly configured that > > they can't live in LINT together with other modules. > > That's no excuse for testing. not testing, you mean? :-) To summarize thus far: 1. What we consider a "reasonable test" of any kernel change has always been a relatively clean build of LINT. 2. Doug built LINT. 3. The sound code you had problems with is enabled in the LINT configuration (the old, not new Luigi code) and thus, assuming that everyone did their bit correctly, *was* tested by Doug and the failure must therefore be in the testing method itself. 4. If building LINT is no longer a sufficient test, we should determine what *is* a sufficient test before we start flaming people. - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21391.897304637>