Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:58 -0600 (CST) From: Jeff Lynch <jeff@mercury.jorsm.com> To: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD ISP <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Whats with this -> sendto: No buffer space available Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112070951530.84433-100000@mercury.jorsm.com> In-Reply-To: <3C1055D0.1090904@quake.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Kal Torak wrote: > Jonathan Hanna wrote: > > > > > No PPP involved with me, and I think with many others. I agree that the > > "no affect" above does look like ordinary buffer exhaustion, though I also have > > a working network except for one interface (or maybe divert socket?). > > Hmmm, perhaps this is related to NAT then??? We see this without using NAT between a 3.x and 4.x box sitting on fastether feeds at two separate colo spaces. Latency is pretty consistent between 30-40ms. We've turned off encryption/compression/stat without help, but switching to tcp seems to help. But we are moving traffic off the vtun as quickly as possible, so that could also be a factor to the noticable increase in stability. ============================================================================ Jeffrey A. Lynch | JORSM Internet, Regional Internet Services email: jeff@jorsm.com | 7 Area Codes in Chicagoland and NW Indiana Voice: (219)322-2180 | 100Mbps+ Connectivity, 56K-DS3, V.90, ISDN Autoresponse: info@jorsm.com | Quality Service, Affordable Prices http://www.jorsm.com | Serving Gov, Biz, Residential Since 1995 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0112070951530.84433-100000>