Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:33:14 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Change tar to GNU Message-ID: <86oeeijgyd.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4215B7EA.5000004@portaone.com> (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:39:54 %2B0200") References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050217192913.38170c-100000@fledge.watson.org> <4214F3C2.4020102@alumni.rice.edu> <20050217195547.GA33893@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <86is4qfenb.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050218092709.GM8471@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20050218093502.GS753@cicely12.cicely.de> <4215B7EA.5000004@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> writes: > Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:27:09AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > Even if you get tar to append to an existing archive it can't know > > about hardlinked files spanning multiple calls. > That's a valid point. I think kientzle is likely to be interested in > adding that functionality. I don't think that's very realistic. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86oeeijgyd.fsf>