Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:50:34 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 94525 for review Message-ID: <b1fa29170604051950p42a77de4y7460b811c73bbbd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200604031505.20667.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200604030738.k337c67u059228@repoman.freebsd.org> <200604031505.20667.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A few printfs, and some comparisons against ints, I'll switch it back
again to see what happens.
-Kip
On 4/3/06, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Monday 03 April 2006 03:38, Kip Macy wrote:
> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=94525
> >
> > Change 94525 by kmacy@kmacy_storage:sun4v_work on 2006/04/03 07:37:31
> >
> > drop cpumask down to 32-bits the rest of freebsd hardcodes the ASSumption
> > move tte_t typedef
>
> Grr, I'd rather we fix FreeBSD. It should be ok to have cpumask_t be a long
> on 64-bit architectures. We can do that later of course, but I'm curious
> what breakage you ran into?
>
> --
> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170604051950p42a77de4y7460b811c73bbbd>