Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:13:04 -0400 From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r206082 - in head: . share/man/man7 share/mk sys/conf Message-ID: <4BB5D140.5070208@cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004021054050.72297@fledge.watson.org> References: <201004020655.o326tWax079882@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004021054050.72297@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > I think there's a reasonable argument that we should be compiling > options KDTRACE_HOOKS into GENERIC, and likewise enabling CTF on the > kernel by default in 9.x. Part of the point of DTrace is that it "just > works", and we already compile CDDL modules by default (and the hooks > don't affect the license of the base kernel as far as I'm aware). Any > thoughts on this? I vaguely remember that there were some problems where CTF was incompatible with debugging, and dumps from CTF enabled kernels were unhelpful. Was this true, and (more importantly), has it been fixed? Drew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BB5D140.5070208>