Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      17 Sep 2003 20:16:41 +0200
From:      sebastian ssmoller <sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net>
To:        Freebsd Current <current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Bad performance
Message-ID:  <1063822590.711.1.camel@tyrael.linnet>
In-Reply-To: <019b01c379fa$f34c88d0$01000001@max900>
References:  <20030913233905.GA3834@crodrigues.org> <1063457548.846.44.camel@tyrael.linnet> <019b01c379fa$f34c88d0$01000001@max900>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
here is my vmstat -i output:


interrupt                     total       rate
stray irq0                        1          0
stray irq7                        1          0
npx0 irq13                        1          0
ata0 irq14                    92143          2
ata1 irq15                       20          0
uhci0 irq11                       1          0
pcm0 irq9                        36          0
rl0 irq10                        11          0
rl1 irq11                     77987          2
fdc0 irq6                         1          0
atkbd0 irq1                    6946          0
clk irq0                    3180967         99
rtc irq8                    4071093        127
Total                       7429208        233


apart from some icq sharing it seems to be ok, doesnt it ?

i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two times faster as
before (!) (30s -> 15-17s)

can anyone explain me why, pls ?

and the other question is: do i really need acpi ? 
i run a desktop system so suspend/resume is not interesting for me.
does fbsd/acpi supend the disk when the system idles ? (linux does not)

thx 
seb

On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 15:28, Max Laier wrote: 
> Interrupts?! Check $vmstat -i
> ACPI? Try disableing it.
> I have a VIA chipset as well and my ata IRQs just went crazy when used with
> ACPI.
> 
> GL
> 
(...)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1063822590.711.1.camel>