Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:05:40 -0200 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <3FCCF094.5040006@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200311251212.59933.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200311250106.hAP16qNp018512@realtime.exit.com> <200311251212.59933.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > Why didn't you pipe up when this was discussed _long_ ago? > I don't understand why you can't buildworld with static slash if you feel so > strongly about it. As for that, it was discussed on arch@, not current@. And _I_, personally, got the impression the plan was to make dynamic world an _option_, not the default. Now, my machines usually get by themselves, but all *I* do on them is sh(1) intensive, so I'll probably be using the static root option when it comes time to upgrade them to 5.x. > If you are deploying FreeBSD on servers you should build your own release > anyway (which is hardly an onerous task). And if you are using FreeBSD on desktop you should use bash or some other ports-shell, instead of slowing down _the_ shell for shell scripts. But that's IMHO, so I didn't pipe this in until now. But it's the very same argument you are making, so I thought you deserved to hear it. -- Daniel C. Sobral Gerência de Operações Divisão de Comunicação de Dados Coordenação de Segurança VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@tcoip.com.brhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FCCF094.5040006>