Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:10:51 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: My make buildworld FreeBSD 6.0R amd64 test
Message-ID:  <20051128111051.GG58778@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20051128105215.GA16457@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <438AA21E.2030702@gneto.com> <20051128104253.GB59977@ip.net.ua> <20051128105215.GA16457@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--iJXiJc/TAIT2rh2r
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:52:16AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:42:53PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:22:22AM +0100, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > >=20
> > > I made some simple comparing of CPU performance between intel and AMD=
=20
> > > CPU:s on FreeBSD 6.0R The intent was to see how things like dualcore =
and=20
> > > Hyperthreading affects a rather CPU bound real world job.
> > >=20
> > > The results can be seen here:
> > > http://www.mullet.se/support/amd64-buildworld.html
> > >=20
> > > Please don't publish this anywhere else, I want to have your comments=
=20
> > > and a chance to fix any errors before I get slashdotted and flamed to=
=20
> > > hell :-)
> > >=20
> > For the starters, you're compiling two different sets of files,
> > one for i386 and another for amd64.  You'd better compare the
> > same set.  This can be done (approximately) by doing a cross-build
> > for say i386: "make -jN buildworld TARGET_ARCH=3Di386".  Also, given
> > the amount of memory that you have in these machines, it shouldn't
> > be a problem to put /usr/src and /usr/obj onto a memory disk.
>=20
> That will only cross-compile on amd64; isn't it better to
> cross-compile a third party (e.g. sparc64) on both i386 and amd64?
>=20
As jkoshy@ has pointed out to me, the Intel CPUs present in
this table support EMT64, so the author is probably running
FreeBSD/amd64 on them and my point about cross-build doesn't
make sense.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--iJXiJc/TAIT2rh2r
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDiuW7qRfpzJluFF4RAmMeAJ95YWEgCuVEH4qcvKrAGa4HDtHxyQCfbYYH
YPC1nUyCURTxfcwt1CQfMuw=
=klr3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iJXiJc/TAIT2rh2r--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051128111051.GG58778>