Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:31:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Scott M. Likens" <damm@fpsn.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMPng status? Message-ID: <20030724023142.GB14907@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1058994384.89355.1.camel@acheron.livid.de> References: <1058994384.89355.1.camel@acheron.livid.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:06:24PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote: > Out of curiosity I was wondering what the SMPng status was? >=20 > I have heard it's not fully implemented due to KSE/libthr not fully > implemented. >=20 > I was wondering if this was incorrect information or what? That's not really correct. The SMP threading libraries are one aspect of SMP development work in 5.x, and modulo bugs, optimization, architectural issues and non-i386 platform support they work. The major aspect of SMP development is kernel subsystem locking, which is not yet complete, and will not be for some time. If you're willing to deal with the usual caveats of running -CURRENT, then by all means do so :-) Kris --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/H0UOWry0BWjoQKURAm++AJ9QTxC4u01cdDfZSH3XqXD7gvFNFACgs94G jtbUqrZI/4nyu7PHJyj4gKY= =hWpt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030724023142.GB14907>