Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:33:32 -0400 From: "Dave Cottlehuber" <dch@skunkwerks.at> To: freebsd-erlang@freebsd.org, "Mark Felder" <feld@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Is there a timeline for making 20 the current version of erlang? Message-ID: <1b1cdd3f-67fb-4710-8474-c880ea6cf6c7@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6a89d758-317d-41a7-819e-2dba1977ea7c@www.fastmail.com> References: <B70BC2F9-E6BA-493F-8208-58E82A065F90@westryn.net> <6a89d758-317d-41a7-819e-2dba1977ea7c@www.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, at 14:45, Mark Felder wrote: > I submitted a review to do this a while ago as part of upgrading Elixi= r to 1.8.x >=20 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19080 >=20 > I don't understand why there's such hesitation to move on from OTP 19,= which people should really stop using. OTP 20 has massive improvements = and even OTP 22-rc1 is already out. In general I concur. It=E2=80=99s easy enough to prepend the path and us= e OTP21 already of course. There are 2 comments and a simpler elixir implementation awaiting your f= eedback, I=E2=80=99ve used a sweet sweet shim instead. Jimmy has a git based build which makes updating a lot simpler perhaps y= ou can give that a whirl? https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19606 We could turn it up to 20 directly imo. A+ Dave
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1b1cdd3f-67fb-4710-8474-c880ea6cf6c7>