Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:54:15 -0500 From: Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>, deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mq on kqueue broken after upgrade to FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <B1267D82-3CA4-44E1-8AB3-AF23F77521D0@perftech.com> In-Reply-To: <20161001201655.GA91457@stack.nl> References: <8A6CD0D3-C4D5-40DF-B2AD-4C454CC88AD1@perftech.com> <20160930094544.GP38409@kib.kiev.ua> <19A6EEAA-C68E-4DAD-B98F-4D904734BD8B@perftech.com> <20160930152006.GS38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160930184418.1047afc2@kan> <20161001092515.GW38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20161001201655.GA91457@stack.nl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> wrote: > The idea is good, but perhaps call the function mq_getfd_np() to clarify > it returns a file descriptor. I have no objection, but for what it’s worth, there could be code out there that uses __mq_oshandle() simply because it’s been around for a while and has been the only way to use poll(), select(), or kevent() with an mqueue ever since an mqd_t changed from an integer to a pointer. In our case, we have a half-dozen or so source files that reference __mq_oshandle(), but we don’t mind changing them if it’s better in the long run. I’m merely pointing out that it’s incompatible with previous FreeBSD versions. Thanks, lewhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B1267D82-3CA4-44E1-8AB3-AF23F77521D0>