Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:54:15 -0500 From: Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>, deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mq on kqueue broken after upgrade to FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <B1267D82-3CA4-44E1-8AB3-AF23F77521D0@perftech.com> In-Reply-To: <20161001201655.GA91457@stack.nl> References: <8A6CD0D3-C4D5-40DF-B2AD-4C454CC88AD1@perftech.com> <20160930094544.GP38409@kib.kiev.ua> <19A6EEAA-C68E-4DAD-B98F-4D904734BD8B@perftech.com> <20160930152006.GS38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160930184418.1047afc2@kan> <20161001092515.GW38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20161001201655.GA91457@stack.nl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> wrote: > The idea is good, but perhaps call the function mq_getfd_np() to clarify > it returns a file descriptor. I have no objection, but for what it’s worth, there could be code out there that uses __mq_oshandle() simply because it’s been around for a while and has been the only way to use poll(), select(), or kevent() with an mqueue ever since an mqd_t changed from an integer to a pointer. In our case, we have a half-dozen or so source files that reference __mq_oshandle(), but we don’t mind changing them if it’s better in the long run. I’m merely pointing out that it’s incompatible with previous FreeBSD versions. Thanks, lewhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B1267D82-3CA4-44E1-8AB3-AF23F77521D0>