Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Jan 2000 19:29:50 +0900
From:      Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
To:        syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Small fix to netstat argument processing
Message-ID:  <20000106192950T.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <200001061006.UAA21698@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>
References:  <200001061006.UAA21698@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Recently that changed, and "netstat -f inet -i" in particular changed to
> give the -f flag priority over the -i flag.  This makes no sense to me,
> so I intend to commit this patch:

Could this be left with adding sflag check?
Because now there is interface statistics display mode, when, e.g.

  netstat -s -I bar0 -f inet6

is specified. (though this is inet6 only now.)

If it is confusing, I'll think of adding new option flag for it.


--- netstat/main.c.old	Tue Jan  4 16:14:46 2000
+++ netstat/main.c	Thu Jan  6 18:19:24 2000
@@ -460,9 +460,6 @@
 	 */
 #endif
 	if (iflag) {
-		if (af != AF_UNSPEC)
+		if (sflag && af != AF_UNSPEC)
			goto protostat;

 		kread(0, 0, 0);
 		intpr(interval, nl[N_IFNET].n_value, NULL);
 		exit(0);




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000106192950T.shin>