Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:14:03 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> Cc: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021112121308.38530G-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20021112170102.GA32440@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, The Anarcat wrote: > How hard would it be to pull to plug on lukemftp[d] and (say) put it > back in -ports, for now? At this point I see no reason to pull the plug on lukemftp; my concerns lie primarily with lukemftpd. From a purely technical perspective, it would be trivial to remove lukemftpd from the tree, or even from the build. The social engineering issues are where you'd probably find the challenges. > On Tue Nov 12, 2002 at 09:09:48AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > [...] > > > > You do realize that we're in a feature freeze right now, and will be in a > > code freeze within days, right? You're coming up a dollar short, and a > > day late. This is the reason I've trying to press for a resolution for > > weeks now. I'm deeply concerned that we've imported software without > > doing any of the necessary mergework and adaptation, and are now > > apparently planning to ship it. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021112121308.38530G-100000>