Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 03:17:54 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Message-ID: <20010901031439.A4397-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200108311443.f7VEh8h14038@green.bikeshed.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: > > Here's an example of a standard utility being clueless about symlinks to > > nothing: > > > > $ ln -s '' foo > > $ cp foo bar > > cp: foo is a directory (not copied) > > > > foo is certainly not a directory. The bug seems to be in fts. > > No, "foo" certainly _is_ a directory. It is precisely the same thing as > ".". No, the empty pathname has been invalid and not an alias for "." since at least the first version of POSIX. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010901031439.A4397-100000>