Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:56:14 -0500
From:      Damian Gerow <dgerow@afflictions.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ath(4) and 802.11g speed
Message-ID:  <20060310065614.GK31158@afflictions.org>
In-Reply-To: <200603100329.49920.joao@matik.com.br>
References:  <20060308231529.GA2049@afflictions.org> <200603101540.21112.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060310052740.GD31158@afflictions.org> <200603100329.49920.joao@matik.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Daniel O'Connor (doconnor@gsoft.com.au) [10/03/06 01:00]:
: Sounds like a question for Sam.

Sam?

: Actually one thing.. Is the AP set for g mode or b only?

11g mode only.  Specifically, autoselect mode 11g, and is currently running
at OFDM54.

Thus spake JoaoBR (joao@matik.com.br) [10/03/06 01:40]:
: > : > Okay, this has me a bit curious, so I dug into it a bit more:
: > : >
: > : >     SSID            BSSID              CHAN RATE  S:N   INT CAPS
: > : >     linksys         00:06:25:7b:25:3d    6   11M 35:0   100 E
: > : >     MYSSID          00:12:17:85:9a:3b   11   54M 39:0   100 E
: > : >     wahoo62         00:13:46:47:0f:0e   11   54M  4:0   100 EPS
: > : >
: > : > I'd have thought that a S:N of 39:0 wouldn't be all that weak, no? 
: > : > Looking at a post by Sam this past August, he calls 30:0 "very strong",
: > : > though that was for an 802.11b link.  I'd think that the higher the
: > : > number, the stronger the signal.  Is the above too weak to handle a
: > : > full 54Mbps link?
: > :
: 
: generally it is not the signalstrength which let you connect at higher speeds, 
: it is the noise level. So you can have a low signal without noise and you may 
: connect at high speed and on the other hand you may have a strong signal and 
: high noise and the speed is 1Mb or do not connect/associate at all

I've been doing some testing with kismet throughout the night, and I've been
seeing consistant signal strengths around -50 to -60dBm, with noise sitting
pretty consistantly at -96, and its strongest reading (after about six
hours) is -90dBm.  At least, if I'm to believe what Kismet is telling me.

This machine is about five feet (albeit through a concrete wall) from the AP.
A wireless laptop that's about twenty feet (again, through concrete) has
connected at 54Mbps without issues.

: > -----
: > ath0: flags=28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROMISC>
: > mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::20f:b5ff:fe20:71ed%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
: > 	inet 192.168.132.146 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.132.255
: > 	ether 00:0f:b5:20:71:ed
: > 	media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect <monitor>
: > 	status: associated
: 
: 
: tha card default in autoselect is probably 11b so it do not connect at 11g 
: until you configure it to
: 
: ifconfig mode 11g media OFDM/54mbps
: 
: should do the job,, tha card still connect at lower speed depending on what it 
: can with the selected AP
: 
: in order to not jumping around you can try setting bssid _MAC_desired_AP_
: 
: so long as your card is in monitor mode you may not connect nor get traffic at 
: all

I don't mind jumping around (the rate selection stuff is there for a
reason), it's that I seemed to be stuck at 11Mbps.  I've manually set it up
to 54Mbps, and still had good network connectivity.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060310065614.GK31158>