Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:43:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Ross Lippert <ripper@eskimo.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stable-digest V5 #601 Message-ID: <200207261043.DAA08192@eskimo.com> In-Reply-To: <bulk.21115.20020725170403@hub.freebsd.org> (owner-freebsd-stable-digest@FreeBSD.ORG)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>wrapper could potentially open a security hole. When you install >X from ports, you get a big flashy notice telling you about the >wrapper, and that should be good enough. Actually, I've always installed X from sysinstall and I didn't know anything about X-Wrapper either. I don't see why a short menu of "xdm\ngdm\nxwrapper\n(none)" can't be displayed to the user that picks an X-base-distribution. Dependencies are tricky I guess because it is a dependency really on "one of" a set of things. -r To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207261043.DAA08192>