Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:23:45 +0200 From: Krassimir Slavchev <krassi@bulinfo.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Performance! Message-ID: <47847681.9040304@bulinfo.net> In-Reply-To: <47840D21.6060807@FreeBSD.org> References: <476A5EE1.9000003@bulinfo.net> <476FF662.6050604@FreeBSD.org> <477BB7C0.3060603@bulinfo.net> <477C1FA3.2070904@FreeBSD.org> <477CC7DC.6060801@bulinfo.net> <47840D21.6060807@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I can't see the patch? Best Regards Kris Kennaway wrote: > Krassimir Slavchev wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello Kris, >> >> Here is the lock profiling results, see the attachment. >> >> Please, let me know if you want ssh access to this machine? > > Thanks, this is very interesting. The problem is already fixed in 8.0 > but we were not seeing it being this much of a factor on our test > hardware. Possibly it is due to your CPUs being moderately faster and > causing a timing difference. Anyway, try this patch. If there is still > a performance deficit then repeating the lock profiling will be useful. > > Kris > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHhHaAxJBWvpalMpkRAuZ0AKCCmeeAMv5VadvnSYmND+8MwOx0IACghPHm JSurVau6L0resFWqNu15iKo= =NTTA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47847681.9040304>