Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 01:17:40 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Subject: Re: nss_ldap broken Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10404010116230.265-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <406B697E.6080309@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Too bad these shared libraries can't be made to use > > the libgcc trick, so they can still be thread-safe > > but not depend on a threads library. > > Sorry to ask stpid questions, but what is `the libgcc > trick' here? See one of my previous posts to this thread WRT #pragma weak. Another option pointed out, is just to make sure libc has all the necessary hooks (I think it does) and don't link shared libraries to libpthread. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10404010116230.265-100000>