Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:05:27 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade
Message-ID:  <20120412150527.GA15996@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:26:59AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular
> with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that
> the Handbook lists it first.

fwiw, the last I talked to stass@, he still considers himself the
maintainer and that it should not have been deprecated.

However, I still think we should list portmaster first.  It and
portupgrade are what are used by the vast majority of our users.

mcl
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120412150527.GA15996>