Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:05:27 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade Message-ID: <20120412150527.GA15996@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:26:59AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular > with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that > the Handbook lists it first. fwiw, the last I talked to stass@, he still considers himself the maintainer and that it should not have been deprecated. However, I still think we should list portmaster first. It and portupgrade are what are used by the vast majority of our users. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120412150527.GA15996>