Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:14:22 +0900 From: itojun@iijlab.net To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/telnet commands.c main.c telnet.1 Message-ID: <9068.990688462@itojun.org> In-Reply-To: peter's message of Thu, 24 May 2001 00:10:13 MST. <20010524071013.8884F380C@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Bizarre... but how about giving inetd the capability to sit on a >> unix domain socket? Now *that* would be interesting. >In my case, it was kinda bizzare as it was using linemode etc when possible. >Yes, inetd would be the logical better place, but I fear going near that >bloated pig^H^H^H^H^H^H^H uhh... "opaque" code. NRL has been supporting unix domain socket in getaddrinfo(3) and getnameinfo(3), and they also do support unix domain socket on inetd. not sure if it is really worthwhile to do this... (i agree it is good for debugging protocol independent-ness) itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9068.990688462>