Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 21:10:15 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG, softweyr@xmission.com Subject: Re: Support for secure http protocols Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971216210834.5409B-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <34973506.B112548D@xmission.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Wes Peters wrote: > So, my question is: if I have the capability (time, interest, etc) to > implement only ONE secure http transport, which one should it be? There > is a draft ieft standard for S-HTTP, but Netscape et al HTTP-SSL seems to > have garnered more support in the real world. SSL. It already exists as an RFC. It can ecapsulate nearly any socket protocol (watch for SSL imap). It also works with every browers now. You can also use it now via the apache-ssl port. Just get a certificate. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.971216210834.5409B-100000>