Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:34:23 +0200 From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, michaelnottebrock@gmx.net Subject: Re: Compiler error XFree86-Server Message-ID: <20020811083423.79b81f4b.marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20020810034803.GA38315@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020806230045.3EFF72DD@nebula.anchoragerescue.org> <3D5127D3.2030601@gmx.net> <20020809043953.GC980@dragon.nuxi.com> <3D534D0F.704@gmx.net> <20020809081355.754aca33.marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <20020809144713.GA3531@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020809212632.3dab64c3.marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <20020810034803.GA38315@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes. But our 5.0-RELEASE is will non-polished; so I think having the
> compiler in the same shape is OK if it means we can get bugs fixed and
> our needs taken care of.
But it's still a relase. :-)
> Many IA-64, and AMD x86-64 bug fixes and improvements aren't merged back
> to the 3.{1,2} branch.
Then we we should go for 3.3. You're right. But why don't we import gcc 3.2
in the meantime to fix the currently broken system gcc?
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020811083423.79b81f4b.marc>