Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:40:36 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: timh@tjhawkins.com Subject: Re: Please explain. Message-ID: <200409190240.41508.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <00d001c49dd4$7382dc40$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> References: <00d001c49dd4$7382dc40$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Sonntag, 19. September 2004 01:08 schrieb timh@tjhawkins.com: > 2 Major Issues: > > - FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue > > - The core kernel issues with FreeBSD is the horrible threading > support.There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The multithreading issue > in freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just made work > arounds, not fixing the actual problem. It seems that the only real BSD > that has made big progress on the core issues is DragonflyBSD. > > It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue that > needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd developers > nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the current smp work are > just 'work-arounds' not real fixing? > > The only thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue. > > Please clarify this. Why should one answer to this email? Use what ever you think qualifies your needs! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409190240.41508.Emanuel.Strobl>