Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:08:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: John Purser <johnmpurser@home.com>, chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: @home.com's e-mail problems Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002031604460.14099-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20000129143315.C73462@sturm.canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Jason Evans wrote: >On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 12:12:02PM -0800, John Purser wrote: >I worked at Critical Path (CP), an email outsourcer, for over a year. >During that year, there were a quite a number of service outages. CP runs >its services on a combination of Solaris and FreeBSD boxes. That CP >doesn't use NT is a definite plus, but it couldn't begin to make up for the >real problem: business goals do not emphasize reliability. If reliability >were a goal, I expect CP could do about as well using NT as FreeBSD (though >not for the same cost). @home may be different, but I doubt it. Why do you say that? That if reliability were a goal, the compnay could do as well with NT as with BSD? -=> jm <=- "Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002031604460.14099-100000>